Austria vs Hong Kong: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Austria
80.58
in 2014
Hong Kong
78.74
in 2014
Austria rank
4th
Hong Kong rank
6th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Austria
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Austria currently reports 80.58 against 78.74 in Hong Kong, a difference of 1.84.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Austria ranks 4th and Hong Kong ranks 6th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.88 | 81.5 | 0.6174 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 80.64 | 78.55 | 2.09 | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Austria or Hong Kong?
- Austria, at 80.58 against 78.74 in Hong Kong as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Austria and Hong Kong?
- 1.84, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Hong Kong?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Austria and Hong Kong rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Austria ranks 4th and Hong Kong ranks 6th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.