Australia vs New Zealand: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Australia
76.34
in 2014
New Zealand
77.84
in 2014
Australia rank
10th
New Zealand rank
8th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Australia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 77.84 against 76.34 in Australia, a difference of 1.5.
Across all 12 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 10th and New Zealand ranks 8th of 181 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.5 | 79.77 | 3.27 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 76.54 | 78.56 | 2.02 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Australia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 77.84 against 76.34 in Australia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Australia and New Zealand?
- 1.5, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Australia and New Zealand rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Australia ranks 10th and New Zealand ranks 8th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.