Australia vs Ireland: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Australia
76.34
in 2014
Ireland
75.47
in 2014
Australia rank
10th
Ireland rank
13th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Australia
- Ireland
How they compare
Australia currently reports 76.34 against 75.47 in Ireland, a difference of 0.87.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Ireland ahead.
Australia ranks 10th and Ireland ranks 13th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Ireland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.5 | 78.41 | 1.92 | Ireland |
| 2010s | 76.54 | 76.21 | 0.3311 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Australia or Ireland?
- Australia, at 76.34 against 75.47 in Ireland as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Australia and Ireland?
- 0.87, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Ireland?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Ireland rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Australia ranks 10th and Ireland ranks 13th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.