Australia vs Belgium: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Australia
76.34
in 2014
Belgium
77.67
in 2014
Australia rank
10th
Belgium rank
9th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Australia
- Belgium
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 77.67 against 76.34 in Australia, a difference of 1.33.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 10th and Belgium ranks 9th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Belgium in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.5 | 76.19 | 0.314 | Australia |
| 2010s | 76.54 | 77.67 | 1.13 | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Australia or Belgium?
- Belgium, at 77.67 against 76.34 in Australia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Australia and Belgium?
- 1.33, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belgium?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Belgium rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Australia ranks 10th and Belgium ranks 9th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.