Australia vs Belarus: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Australia
76.34
in 2014
Belarus
78.7
in 2014
Australia rank
10th
Belarus rank
7th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Australia
- Belarus
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 78.7 against 76.34 in Australia, a difference of 2.36.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 10th and Belarus ranks 7th of 181 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.5 | 81.55 | 5.05 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 76.54 | 79.18 | 2.64 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Australia or Belarus?
- Belarus, at 78.7 against 76.34 in Australia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Australia and Belarus?
- 2.36, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belarus?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2014.
- How do Australia and Belarus rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Australia ranks 10th and Belarus ranks 7th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.