Antigua and Barbuda vs Puerto Rico: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
56.19
in 2014
Puerto Rico
56.03
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
97th
Puerto Rico rank
98th
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 56.19 against 56.03 in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.16.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 97th and Puerto Rico ranks 98th of 181 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.98 | 56.3 | 2.68 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 57.56 | 56.14 | 1.42 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Puerto Rico?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 56.19 against 56.03 in Puerto Rico as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Puerto Rico?
- 0.16, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Puerto Rico?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Puerto Rico rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 97th and Puerto Rico ranks 98th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.