Antigua and Barbuda vs Panama: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score

Antigua and Barbuda
56.19
in 2014
Panama
56.02
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
97th
Panama rank
99th

Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Panama
0204060200320082014

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 56.19 against 56.02 in Panama, a difference of 0.17.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 97th and Panama ranks 99th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Panama Difference Ahead
2000s 58.98 54.37 4.61 Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 57.56 57.73 0.1725 Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Panama?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 56.19 against 56.02 in Panama as of 2014.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Panama?
0.17, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Panama?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Panama rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 97th and Panama ranks 99th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 2,113 data points, 2003–2014
Last refreshed

The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.