Angola vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Angola
25.22
in 2014
Suriname
28.84
in 2014
Angola rank
182nd
Suriname rank
181st
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Angola
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 28.84 against 25.22 in Angola, a difference of 3.62.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 182nd and Suriname ranks 181st of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.72 | 28.84 | 1.88 | Angola |
| 2010s | 25.22 | 28.84 | 3.62 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Angola or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 28.84 against 25.22 in Angola as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Angola and Suriname?
- 3.62, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Suriname?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Angola and Suriname rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Angola ranks 182nd and Suriname ranks 181st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.