Afghanistan vs Suriname: Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score
Afghanistan
29.79
in 2014
Suriname
28.84
in 2014
Afghanistan rank
179th
Suriname rank
181st
Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Afghanistan
- Suriname
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 29.79 against 28.84 in Suriname, a difference of 0.95.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Suriname ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 179th and Suriname ranks 181st of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.75 | 28.84 | 0.0879 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 29.16 | 28.84 | 0.3288 | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score, Afghanistan or Suriname?
- Afghanistan, at 29.79 against 28.84 in Suriname as of 2014.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score between Afghanistan and Suriname?
- 0.95, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Suriname?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Afghanistan and Suriname rank globally for enforcing contracts (db04-15 methodology) - score?
- Afghanistan ranks 179th and Suriname ranks 181st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB04-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB04-15 studies.