Iceland vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts: Court fees
Iceland
2.1%
in 2019
Mauritius
2.0%
in 2019
Iceland rank
168th
Mauritius rank
170th
Enforcing contracts: Court fees over time
- Iceland
- Mauritius
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 2.1% against 2.0% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 168th and Mauritius ranks 170th of 191 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court fees, Iceland or Mauritius?
- Iceland, at 2.1% against 2.0% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court fees between Iceland and Mauritius?
- 0.1%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritius?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Iceland and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts: court fees?
- Iceland ranks 168th and Mauritius ranks 170th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court fees include all costs that plaintiff must advance to the court, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff. Court costs include the fees that the parties must pay to obtain an expert opinion, regardless of whether they are paid to the court or to the expert directly.