Chile vs Samoa: Enforcing contracts: Court fees
Chile
5.0%
in 2019
Samoa
5.0%
in 2019
Chile rank
100th
Samoa rank
100th
Enforcing contracts: Court fees over time
- Chile
- Samoa
How they compare
Chile currently reports 5.0% against 5.0% in Samoa, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 100th and Samoa ranks 100th of 191 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court fees, Chile or Samoa?
- Chile, at 5.0% against 5.0% in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court fees between Chile and Samoa?
- 0.0%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Samoa?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Samoa rank globally for enforcing contracts: court fees?
- Chile ranks 100th and Samoa ranks 100th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court fees (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court fees include all costs that plaintiff must advance to the court, regardless of the final cost borne by plaintiff. Court costs include the fees that the parties must pay to obtain an expert opinion, regardless of whether they are paid to the court or to the expert directly.