United Arab Emirates vs United States: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- United Arab Emirates
- United States
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in United States, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
United Arab Emirates ranks 13th and United States ranks 13th of 191 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), United Arab Emirates or United States?
- United Arab Emirates, at 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in United States as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between United Arab Emirates and United States?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Arab Emirates and United States?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do United Arab Emirates and United States rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- United Arab Emirates ranks 13th and United States ranks 13th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.