Trinidad and Tobago vs Vanuatu: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Trinidad and Tobago
0.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Vanuatu
0.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago rank
90th
Vanuatu rank
90th
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.5 DB17-20 methodology against 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in Vanuatu, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Vanuatu has been ahead every year.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 90th and Vanuatu ranks 90th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Trinidad and Tobago or Vanuatu?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.5 DB17-20 methodology against 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in Vanuatu as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Trinidad and Tobago and Vanuatu?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Vanuatu?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Trinidad and Tobago and Vanuatu rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 90th and Vanuatu ranks 90th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.