San Marino vs Saint Lucia: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
San Marino
1.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Saint Lucia
1.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
San Marino rank
56th
Saint Lucia rank
56th
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- San Marino
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 1.5 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
San Marino ranks 56th and Saint Lucia ranks 56th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), San Marino or Saint Lucia?
- San Marino, at 1.5 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in Saint Lucia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between San Marino and Saint Lucia?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Saint Lucia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do San Marino and Saint Lucia rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- San Marino ranks 56th and Saint Lucia ranks 56th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.