Papua New Guinea vs Thailand: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Thailand
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 1 DB17-20 methodology against 1 DB17-20 methodology in Thailand, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 71st and Thailand ranks 71st of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Papua New Guinea or Thailand?
- Papua New Guinea, at 1 DB17-20 methodology against 1 DB17-20 methodology in Thailand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Papua New Guinea and Thailand?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Thailand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Thailand rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 71st and Thailand ranks 71st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.