New Zealand vs San Marino: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
New Zealand
1.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
San Marino
1.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
New Zealand rank
56th
San Marino rank
56th
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- New Zealand
- San Marino
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 1.5 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in San Marino, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 56th and San Marino ranks 56th of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), New Zealand or San Marino?
- New Zealand, at 1.5 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in San Marino as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between New Zealand and San Marino?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and San Marino?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and San Marino rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- New Zealand ranks 56th and San Marino ranks 56th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.