Micronesia, Federated States of vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)

Micronesia, Federated States of
0.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
South Africa
0.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
90th
South Africa rank
90th

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time

  • Micronesia, Federated States of
  • South Africa
00.10.20.30.40.5201520172019

How they compare

Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 0.5 DB17-20 methodology against 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in South Africa, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 90th and South Africa ranks 90th of 191 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Micronesia, Federated States of or South Africa?
Micronesia, Federated States of, at 0.5 DB17-20 methodology against 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in South Africa as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Micronesia, Federated States of and South Africa?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and South Africa?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Micronesia, Federated States of and South Africa rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 90th and South Africa ranks 90th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia, Federated States of vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4). Statizoid. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-automation-0-4-db17-20-methodology/micronesia-fed-sts/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-automation-0-4-db17-20-methodology/micronesia-fed-sts/south-africa/">Micronesia, Federated States of vs South Africa: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.