Mauritius vs United Arab Emirates: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Mauritius
3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Mauritius rank
13th
United Arab Emirates rank
13th
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- Mauritius
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 13th and United Arab Emirates ranks 13th of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Mauritius or United Arab Emirates?
- Mauritius, at 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Mauritius and United Arab Emirates?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and United Arab Emirates?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and United Arab Emirates rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Mauritius ranks 13th and United Arab Emirates ranks 13th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.