Malta vs Panama: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Malta
1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Panama
1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Malta rank
71st
Panama rank
71st
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- Malta
- Panama
How they compare
Malta currently reports 1 DB17-20 methodology against 1 DB17-20 methodology in Panama, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 71st and Panama ranks 71st of 188 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Malta or Panama?
- Malta, at 1 DB17-20 methodology against 1 DB17-20 methodology in Panama as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Malta and Panama?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Panama?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Malta and Panama rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Malta ranks 71st and Panama ranks 71st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.