Malawi vs Poland: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)

Malawi
1.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Poland
1.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Malawi rank
56th
Poland rank
56th

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time

  • Malawi
  • Poland
00.511.5201520172019

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 1.5 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in Poland, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 56th and Poland ranks 56th of 188 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Malawi or Poland?
Malawi, at 1.5 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in Poland as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Malawi and Poland?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Poland?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Malawi and Poland rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
Malawi ranks 56th and Poland ranks 56th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.