Libya vs Qatar: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)

Libya
0 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Qatar
0 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Libya rank
118th
Qatar rank
118th

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time

  • Libya
  • Qatar
00.20.40.60.81201520172019

How they compare

Libya currently reports 0 DB17-20 methodology against 0 DB17-20 methodology in Qatar, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 118th and Qatar ranks 118th of 188 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Libya or Qatar?
Libya, at 0 DB17-20 methodology against 0 DB17-20 methodology in Qatar as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Libya and Qatar?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Qatar?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Libya and Qatar rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
Libya ranks 118th and Qatar ranks 118th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.