Jordan vs Papua New Guinea: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- Jordan
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 1 DB17-20 methodology against 1 DB17-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Jordan ranks 71st and Papua New Guinea ranks 71st of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Jordan or Papua New Guinea?
- Jordan, at 1 DB17-20 methodology against 1 DB17-20 methodology in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Jordan and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Papua New Guinea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Jordan ranks 71st and Papua New Guinea ranks 71st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.