Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Japan: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)

Iran, Islamic Republic of
1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Japan
1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Republic of rank
71st
Japan rank
71st

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time

  • Iran, Islamic Republic of
  • Japan
00.20.40.60.81201520172019

How they compare

Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 1 DB17-20 methodology against 1 DB17-20 methodology in Japan, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 71st and Japan ranks 71st of 190 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Iran, Islamic Republic of or Japan?
Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 1 DB17-20 methodology against 1 DB17-20 methodology in Japan as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Japan?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Japan?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Japan rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 71st and Japan ranks 71st of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Japan: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-automation-0-4-db17-20-methodology/iran-islamic-rep/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-automation-0-4-db17-20-methodology/iran-islamic-rep/japan/">Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Japan: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.