Indonesia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- Indonesia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 0.61 DB17-20 methodology against 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.11 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.2 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 89th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 90th of 191 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Indonesia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Indonesia, at 0.61 DB17-20 methodology against 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Indonesia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.11 DB17-20 methodology, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Indonesia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Indonesia ranks 89th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 90th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.