Indonesia vs Micronesia (country): Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- Indonesia
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 0.61 DB17-20 methodology against 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.11 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.2 times Micronesia (country)'s.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 89th and Micronesia (country) ranks 90th of 190 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Indonesia or Micronesia (country)?
- Indonesia, at 0.61 DB17-20 methodology against 0.5 DB17-20 methodology in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Indonesia and Micronesia (country)?
- 0.11 DB17-20 methodology, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Micronesia (country)?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Indonesia and Micronesia (country) rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Indonesia ranks 89th and Micronesia (country) ranks 90th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.