Hong Kong, China vs Malta: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Hong Kong, China
1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Malta
1 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
71st
Malta rank
71st
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Malta
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 1 DB17-20 methodology against 1 DB17-20 methodology in Malta, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 71st and Malta ranks 71st of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Hong Kong, China or Malta?
- Hong Kong, China, at 1 DB17-20 methodology against 1 DB17-20 methodology in Malta as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Hong Kong, China and Malta?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Malta?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Malta rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 71st and Malta ranks 71st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.