Equatorial Guinea vs East Timor: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Equatorial Guinea
0 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
East Timor
0 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
118th
East Timor rank
118th
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- East Timor
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 DB17-20 methodology against 0 DB17-20 methodology in East Timor, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 118th and East Timor ranks 118th of 190 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Equatorial Guinea or East Timor?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0 DB17-20 methodology against 0 DB17-20 methodology in East Timor as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Equatorial Guinea and East Timor?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and East Timor?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and East Timor rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 118th and East Timor ranks 118th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.