Denmark vs United Kingdom: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- Denmark
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in United Kingdom, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 9th and United Kingdom ranks 9th of 190 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Denmark or United Kingdom?
- Denmark, at 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in United Kingdom as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Denmark and United Kingdom?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and United Kingdom?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Denmark and United Kingdom rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Denmark ranks 9th and United Kingdom ranks 9th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.