Congo vs Ecuador: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)

Congo
0 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Ecuador
0 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Congo rank
118th
Ecuador rank
118th

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time

  • Congo
  • Ecuador
00.20.40.60.81201520172019

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0 DB17-20 methodology against 0 DB17-20 methodology in Ecuador, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 118th and Ecuador ranks 118th of 188 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Congo or Ecuador?
Congo, at 0 DB17-20 methodology against 0 DB17-20 methodology in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Congo and Ecuador?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Ecuador?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Congo and Ecuador rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
Congo ranks 118th and Ecuador ranks 118th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.