What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between China (People’s Republic of) and United Arab Emirates?

0 DB17-20 methodology, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and United Arab Emirates?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China (People’s Republic of) vs United Arab Emirates: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)

China (People’s Republic of)

3 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

United Arab Emirates

3 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

China (People’s Republic of) rank

13th

United Arab Emirates rank

13th

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time

China (People’s Republic of)
United Arab Emirates

How they compare

China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.

China (People’s Republic of) ranks 13th and United Arab Emirates ranks 13th of 190 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), China (People’s Republic of) or United Arab Emirates?: China (People’s Republic of), at 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between China (People’s Republic of) and United Arab Emirates?: 0 DB17-20 methodology, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and United Arab Emirates?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do China (People’s Republic of) and United Arab Emirates rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?: China (People’s Republic of) ranks 13th and United Arab Emirates ranks 13th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China (People’s Republic of) vs United Arab Emirates: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4). Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-automation-0-4-db17-20-methodology/china/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-automation-0-4-db17-20-methodology/china/united-arab-emirates/">China (People’s Republic of) vs United Arab Emirates: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit: DB17-20 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.