China (People’s Republic of) vs Kazakhstan: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- China (People’s Republic of)
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 13th and Kazakhstan ranks 13th of 190 countries.
China (People’s Republic of) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), China (People’s Republic of) or Kazakhstan?
- China (People’s Republic of), at 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between China (People’s Republic of) and Kazakhstan?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Kazakhstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do China (People’s Republic of) and Kazakhstan rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- China (People’s Republic of) ranks 13th and Kazakhstan ranks 13th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.