China (People’s Republic of) vs Italy: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)

China (People’s Republic of)
3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Italy
3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
China (People’s Republic of) rank
13th
Italy rank
13th

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time

  • China (People’s Republic of)
  • Italy
0123201520172019

How they compare

China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in Italy, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

China (People’s Republic of) ranks 13th and Italy ranks 13th of 190 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), China (People’s Republic of) or Italy?
China (People’s Republic of), at 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in Italy as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between China (People’s Republic of) and Italy?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Italy?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do China (People’s Republic of) and Italy rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 13th and Italy ranks 13th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China (People’s Republic of) vs Italy: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4). Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-automation-0-4-db17-20-methodology/china/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-automation-0-4-db17-20-methodology/china/italy/">China (People’s Republic of) vs Italy: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.