Canada vs United States of America: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time
- Canada
- United States of America
How they compare
Canada currently reports 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in United States of America, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was United States of America ahead.
Canada ranks 13th and United States of America ranks 13th of 190 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Canada or United States of America?
- Canada, at 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in United States of America as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Canada and United States of America?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and United States of America?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Canada and United States of America rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
- Canada ranks 13th and United States of America ranks 13th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.