Bhutan vs Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)

Bhutan
0 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Lao People’s Democratic Republic
0 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Bhutan rank
118th
Lao People’s Democratic Republic rank
118th

Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
00.20.40.60.81201520172019

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0 DB17-20 methodology against 0 DB17-20 methodology in Lao People’s Democratic Republic, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Lao People’s Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 118th and Lao People’s Democratic Republic ranks 118th of 190 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4), Bhutan or Lao People’s Democratic Republic?
Bhutan, at 0 DB17-20 methodology against 0 DB17-20 methodology in Lao People’s Democratic Republic as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4) between Bhutan and Lao People’s Democratic Republic?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Lao People’s Democratic Republic?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Bhutan and Lao People’s Democratic Republic rank globally for enforcing contracts: court automation (0-4)?
Bhutan ranks 118th and Lao People’s Democratic Republic ranks 118th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4). Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-automation-0-4-db17-20-methodology/bhutan/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-automation-0-4-db17-20-methodology/bhutan/lao-pdr/">Bhutan vs Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court automation (0-4) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court automation evaluates four aspects: (i) whether the initial complaint can be filed electronically; (ii) whether the initial complaint can be served electronically; (iii) whether court fees can be paid electronically; and (iv) whether judgments rendered in commercial matters are made available to the public. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.