Sweden vs United States: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Sweden
65.9%
in 2019
United States
65.8%
in 2019
Sweden rank
112th
United States rank
114th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Sweden
- United States
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 65.9% against 65.8% in United States, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was United States ahead.
Sweden ranks 112th and United States ranks 114th of 191 countries.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.9% | 82.0% | 17.1% | United States |
| 2010s | 65.5% | 69.9% | 4.4% | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Sweden or United States?
- Sweden, at 65.9% against 65.8% in United States as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Sweden and United States?
- 0.1%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and United States?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Sweden and United States rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Sweden ranks 112th and United States ranks 114th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.