Sweden vs Tonga: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Sweden
65.9%
in 2019
Tonga
65.8%
in 2019
Sweden rank
112th
Tonga rank
113th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Sweden
- Tonga
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 65.9% against 65.8% in Tonga, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Tonga ahead.
Sweden ranks 112th and Tonga ranks 113th of 190 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.9% | 65.8% | 0.9% | Tonga |
| 2010s | 65.5% | 65.8% | 0.3% | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Sweden or Tonga?
- Sweden, at 65.9% against 65.8% in Tonga as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Sweden and Tonga?
- 0.1%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Tonga?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Sweden and Tonga rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Sweden ranks 112th and Tonga ranks 113th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.