Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Sweden: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
66.0%
in 2019
Sweden
65.9%
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
111th
Sweden rank
112th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
- Sweden
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 66.0% against 65.9% in Sweden, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 111th and Sweden ranks 112th of 191 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.0% | 64.9% | 1.1% | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2010s | 66.0% | 65.5% | 0.6% | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Sweden?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 66.0% against 65.9% in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Sweden?
- 0.1%, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Sweden?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Sweden rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 111th and Sweden ranks 112th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.