Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Palestine, State of: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Saint Kitts and Nevis
70.2%
in 2019
Palestine, State of
69.7%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
85th
Palestine, State of rank
88th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 70.2% against 69.7% in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th and Palestine, State of ranks 88th of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.0% | 69.7% | 5.3% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 71.2% | 69.7% | 1.4% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Palestine, State of?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 70.2% against 69.7% in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Palestine, State of?
- 0.5%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Palestine, State of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Palestine, State of rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 85th and Palestine, State of ranks 88th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.