Somalia vs Tunisia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Somalia
76.0%
in 2019
Tunisia
75.6%
in 2019
Somalia rank
44th
Tunisia rank
47th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Somalia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Somalia currently reports 76.0% against 75.6% in Tunisia, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Somalia has been ahead every year.
Somalia ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 47th of 191 countries.
Somalia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Somalia or Tunisia?
- Somalia, at 76.0% against 75.6% in Tunisia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Somalia and Tunisia?
- 0.4%, with Somalia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Somalia and Tunisia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Somalia and Tunisia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Somalia ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 47th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.