Singapore vs Tajikistan: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Singapore
71.1%
in 2019
Tajikistan
71.4%
in 2019
Singapore rank
79th
Tajikistan rank
76th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Singapore
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 71.4% against 71.1% in Singapore, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Singapore ahead.
Singapore ranks 79th and Tajikistan ranks 76th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Singapore averaged higher in 1 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.5% | 71.4% | 5.1% | Singapore |
| 2010s | 71.1% | 71.4% | 0.3% | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Singapore or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 71.4% against 71.1% in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Singapore and Tajikistan?
- 0.3%, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Tajikistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Singapore and Tajikistan rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Singapore ranks 79th and Tajikistan ranks 76th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.