San Marino vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
San Marino
84.5%
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
84.0%
in 2019
San Marino rank
6th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
7th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- San Marino
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 84.5% against 84.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
San Marino ranks 6th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 7th of 191 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, San Marino or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- San Marino, at 84.5% against 84.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between San Marino and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.5%, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do San Marino and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- San Marino ranks 6th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.