Samoa vs Switzerland: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Samoa
72.7%
in 2019
Switzerland
73.1%
in 2019
Samoa rank
70th
Switzerland rank
68th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Samoa
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 73.1% against 72.7% in Samoa, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
Samoa ranks 70th and Switzerland ranks 68th of 190 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.7% | 75.4% | 2.7% | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 72.7% | 73.1% | 0.5% | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Samoa or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 73.1% against 72.7% in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Samoa and Switzerland?
- 0.4%, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Switzerland?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Samoa and Switzerland rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Samoa ranks 70th and Switzerland ranks 68th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.