Qatar vs United Arab Emirates: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Qatar
75.8%
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
76.5%
in 2019
Qatar rank
46th
United Arab Emirates rank
43rd
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Qatar
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 76.5% against 75.8% in Qatar, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 13 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Qatar ranks 46th and United Arab Emirates ranks 43rd of 191 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.8% | 77.2% | 1.3% | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 75.8% | 76.9% | 1.1% | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Qatar or United Arab Emirates?
- United Arab Emirates, at 76.5% against 75.8% in Qatar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Qatar and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.7%, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and United Arab Emirates?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Qatar and United Arab Emirates rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Qatar ranks 46th and United Arab Emirates ranks 43rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.