Qatar vs Tunisia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Qatar
75.8%
in 2019
Tunisia
75.6%
in 2019
Qatar rank
46th
Tunisia rank
47th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Qatar
- Tunisia
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 75.8% against 75.6% in Tunisia, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Qatar has been ahead every year.
Qatar ranks 46th and Tunisia ranks 47th of 190 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 75.8% | 75.6% | 0.2% | Qatar |
| 2010s | 75.8% | 75.6% | 0.2% | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Qatar or Tunisia?
- Qatar, at 75.8% against 75.6% in Tunisia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Qatar and Tunisia?
- 0.2%, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Tunisia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Qatar and Tunisia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Qatar ranks 46th and Tunisia ranks 47th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.