Puerto Rico vs Tonga: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Puerto Rico
66.1%
in 2019
Tonga
65.8%
in 2019
Puerto Rico rank
110th
Tonga rank
113th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Puerto Rico
- Tonga
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 66.1% against 65.8% in Tonga, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Puerto Rico ranks 110th and Tonga ranks 113th of 191 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.1% | 65.8% | 0.3% | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 66.1% | 65.8% | 0.3% | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Puerto Rico or Tonga?
- Puerto Rico, at 66.1% against 65.8% in Tonga as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Puerto Rico and Tonga?
- 0.3%, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Tonga?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Puerto Rico and Tonga rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Puerto Rico ranks 110th and Tonga ranks 113th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.