Puerto Rico vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Puerto Rico
66.1%
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
66.0%
in 2019
Puerto Rico rank
110th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
111th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Puerto Rico
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 66.1% against 66.0% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.
Puerto Rico ranks 110th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 111th of 191 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Puerto Rico | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.1% | 66.0% | 0.1% | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 66.1% | 66.0% | 0.1% | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Puerto Rico or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Puerto Rico, at 66.1% against 66.0% in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Puerto Rico and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.1%, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Puerto Rico and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Puerto Rico ranks 110th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 111th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.