Portugal vs Thailand: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Portugal
80.8%
in 2019
Thailand
81.1%
in 2019
Portugal rank
22nd
Thailand rank
21st
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Portugal
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 81.1% against 80.8% in Portugal, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Portugal ranks 22nd and Thailand ranks 21st of 191 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.5% | 86.2% | 5.7% | Thailand |
| 2010s | 81.1% | 83.1% | 2.0% | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Portugal or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 81.1% against 80.8% in Portugal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Portugal and Thailand?
- 0.3%, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Thailand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Portugal and Thailand rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Portugal ranks 22nd and Thailand ranks 21st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.