Philippines vs United States of America: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Philippines
65.2%
in 2019
United States of America
65.8%
in 2019
Philippines rank
116th
United States of America rank
114th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Philippines
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 65.8% against 65.2% in Philippines, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 116th and United States of America ranks 114th of 191 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.4% | 82.0% | 10.5% | United States of America |
| 2010s | 66.9% | 69.9% | 2.9% | United States of America |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Philippines or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 65.8% against 65.2% in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Philippines and United States of America?
- 0.6%, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and United States of America?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Philippines and United States of America rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Philippines ranks 116th and United States of America ranks 114th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.