Philippines vs Tonga: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score

Philippines
65.2%
in 2019
Tonga
65.8%
in 2019
Philippines rank
116th
Tonga rank
113th

Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time

  • Philippines
  • Tonga
020406080200320112019

How they compare

Tonga currently reports 65.8% against 65.2% in Philippines, a difference of 0.6%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Philippines ahead.

Philippines ranks 116th and Tonga ranks 113th of 188 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 71.4% 65.8% 5.6% Philippines
2010s 66.9% 65.8% 1.1% Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Philippines or Tonga?
Tonga, at 65.8% against 65.2% in Philippines as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Philippines and Tonga?
0.6%, with Tonga ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Tonga?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Philippines and Tonga rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
Philippines ranks 116th and Tonga ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.