Panama vs Zambia: Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score
Panama
57.4%
in 2019
Zambia
56.6%
in 2019
Panama rank
144th
Zambia rank
145th
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score over time
- Panama
- Zambia
How they compare
Panama currently reports 57.4% against 56.6% in Zambia, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Zambia ahead.
Panama ranks 144th and Zambia ranks 145th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.9% | 56.6% | 12.7% | Zambia |
| 2010s | 57.4% | 56.6% | 0.8% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score, Panama or Zambia?
- Panama, at 57.4% against 56.6% in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score between Panama and Zambia?
- 0.8%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zambia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Panama and Zambia rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost (% of claim) - score?
- Panama ranks 144th and Zambia ranks 145th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for cost to enforce contracts benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.